The most current issue regarding the abolishment of the death penalty was Baze v. Capital punishment, Crime, Death row, Electric chair, Hanging, Lethal injection, Murder, Prison, Stoning. Another reason why the death penalty should be repealed is because it is extremely expensive. Deterrence is a psychological process, argumentative essays on death penalty. This is your chance to pay it forward! Written by academic experts with 10 years of experience.
Works Cited
The death penalty is the ultimate punishment. There is no harsher punishment than death itself. Currently fifty-eight nations practice the death penalty. Our nation, the United States of America, is one of the fifty-eight nations that practice the death penalty. Argumentative essays on death penalty the United States will only use the death penalty, if one commits first-degree murder. Individuals that believe in the death penalty believe that capital punishment will deter murderers. In this paper, I will be arguing that the death penalty does not deter criminals and that the United States should outlaw the practice. Before I make my argument, I would like to provide some background information regarding the death penalty to the readers.
The idea of capital punishment was brought over from Britain, when the founding fathers declared independence. Our ancestors loved the idea of the death penalty, since it was a common part of life. Europeans gave the death penalty for various crimes. The first recorded execution in America occurred in Jamestown, A man named George Kendall was executed for treason. In the earlier colonial days, laws regarding capital punishment varied area to area. During the nineteen century, the death penalty changed dramatically. Around this time the death penalty started to lose popularity. States no longer committed public executions. All executions were done in private. Pennsylvania was the first state to adopt this trend. Eventually some states abolished the death penalty all together.
In current times, fourteen out of fifty states no longer carry out the death penalty. These states are Alaska, Hawaii, Iowa, argumentative essays on death penalty, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Rhone Island, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin, argumentative essays on death penalty. In addition, a series of cases regarding the death penalty went to the Supreme Court. Many tried to argue that the death penalty violated the eighth amendments and that capital punishment is cruel and unusual. InFurman v. Georgia successfully brought an temporary end to the death penalty for ten years. Eventually the death penalty was reinstated with the execution argumentative essays on death penalty Gary Gillmore on January 17, As of today, the United States still practices capital punishment.
However there are limitations. For example, the government cannot execute the mentally handicap and is not supposed to execute juveniles. The United States currently has six ways to execute, lethal injection, electrocution, lethal gas, a firing squad and hanging. Methods will vary state by state. Although the United States still practices the death penalty, argumentative essays on death penalty, executions are declining, compare to the past, according to statistics. Those that are for the death penalty claims that the death penalty will serve as a deterrence and is the only way for retribution against murderers, argumentative essays on death penalty.
Both issues are highly debatable and have been a subject of criticism. Punishment as a deterrence has been a goal for ages. This concept does work, but it should not be applied to all criminals, in my opinion. Pro capital punishment individuals claims that it is an efficient deterrence against criminals. We believe that this has occurred in part because of the strong signal that the death penalty sent to violent criminals and murderer. There is a huge amount of conflicting evidence from similar studies done currently and argumentative essays on death penalty the past. Retribution has also been a goal for punishment. Logically if a killer is put to death then there would be no more killings. American society seems to favor retribution.
An eye for an eye has been a law for ages. Unless that balance is restored, society succumbs to a rule of violence. For example, if the country is punishing one for killing, what gives the country the right to kill? Jeffrey Fagan of Columbia University describes numerous serious errors in recent deterrence studies, including improper statistical analyses and missing data and variables that are necessary to give a full picture of the criminal justice system. These flaws and omissions in a body of scientific evidence render it unreliable as a basis for law or policy that generate life-and-death decisions. Those who claim that the death penalty is an efficient deterrence fail to submit conclusive evidence, therefore as a critic, we should dismiss the claim that the death penalty works as deterrence.
In addition, many studies seem to disprove the theory that the death penalty is a good deterrence against violent crimes and murders. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, states without the death penalty have had lower murder rates. In fact, in the first year that New York abolished the death penalty they saw a four percent decrease in their murder rates. The reason why the death penalty does not serve as deterrence is that offenders do not believe they will be caught. Deterrence is a psychological process. Therefore, if an offender does argumentative essays on death penalty believe that a real risk is present, there will be no deterrence. The death penalty as retribution no longer makes sense in our current society.
By executing an offender, our government, is sending subliminal messages regarding murder. The point of capital punishment is because the United States government wants to express that killing is an intolerable crime. By killing, an offender the government is contradicting itself. In addition, the death penalty can be seen as revenge. We are simply taking an eye for an eye. Two wrongs will not make a right. Killing a murderer will not bring back the murdered. In the 21th century our criminals laws should now reflect a higher standard that an eye for an eye. In current times, argumentative essays on death penalty death penalty can no longer be claimed as an efficient form of retribution.
There are huge delays in carrying out the executions of an inmate. Statistics show that there is over an eight-year wait before an execution can take place. In fact, most death row inmates die of old age, before their execution sentence. Sinceonly thirteen inmates have been executed. If the trend continues, that would mean most of the inmates would die of natural causes before their execution sentence can be carried out. Those that claim the death penalty as retribution fail to take notice of the execution process in our criminal justice system. Appealing is needed in the American criminal justice system because the process is designed to protect against human errors. An average appeal can take over ten years.
There are simply not enough judges to response to all case reviews. For example, the United States Supreme court receives thousands of case reviews annually, but because there are only nine judges in the Supreme Court, only a handful of cases are reviewed. For these reasons, the death penalty cannot be claim as an efficient form of retribution. Since argumentative essays on death penalty death penalty is no longer an affected punishment, I purposed that we abolish the practice in the United States. Many were successful in temporary abolishing the death penalty, but most states reinstated the death penalty after judicial review. The most current issue regarding the abolishment of the death penalty was Baze v.
Baze V. Rees, argumentative essays on death penalty, was an attack on the process of execution, specifically lethal injections. Baze argues that lethal injections is a form of cruel and unusual punishment and went against the constitution. That debate ultimately failed, since the judges ruled in favor of the death penalty. Rees was a good attempt in trying to abolish the death penalty, but ultimately was unsuccessful because they were attacking the process not the problem. In addition, Baze fail to show any solid evidence that lethal injections may cause pain. In order to abolish the death penalty in the United States successfully, one would need to make a case to the United States Supreme Court.
One would need to submit a writ of either certiorari, mandamus, or prohibition. In addition, one can appeal against the death penalty. If the case were selected, then one would need to argue that the death penalty is no longer a form of justice. The key to winning this case, in my opinion, is to present solid and conclusive evidence. Show the nine justices, that the death penalty is a waste of resources and unconstitutional. Some may criticize that by abolishing the death penalty, crime rates will increase. Studies have already shown that the death penalty will not deter criminals. Currently there is no solid evidence that proves that the death penalty will deter criminals; however, there is evidence showing that states with no death penalty has a lower murder rate than states with the death penalty.
Conclusive evidence such as the fact should dispel any criticism regarding the death penalty and murder rates, argumentative essays on death penalty. The death penalty should be abolish. Those that believe in the death penalty, failed to make their case. There is no conclusive evidence that supports their claims. There is evidence however that the death penalty is failing.
history essays
Another reason why the death penalty should be repealed is because it is extremely expensive. This proves that the states are spending billions of dollars just to execute people when that money could be going towards something more beneficial. This proves that the cost of housing just one single death row inmate is very expensive. If housing just one is millions of dollars, than imagine how much money it is when housing multiple. This shows that capital cases cost a lot of money and is very expensive. It cost way more than it would cost if it was just life without parole. Another reason why the death penalty should be repealed is because it kills innocent people. This quote proves that over people has been put on death that are innocent.
According to Holloway there was this man name Henry McCollum, who was in prison for 30 years on death row for the murder of an 11 year old girl which evidence showed that he did not do. This case proves that some death row cases are unfair and they convict innocent people. Even though many people feel that the death penalty should be abolished, there are many people who support it. People who support the death penalty says it saves lives. Rubin, and Joanna M. Even though many think it will bring closure, it can also bring stress and trauma on others such as those involved. The death penalty is senseless and discriminatory. It brings nothing but stress, debt, and innocent lives lost. StudySaurus is run by two uni-students that still get a kick out of learning new things.
We hope to share these experiences with you. Stuck on Your Essay? Search For Search. Home Knowledge Base Popular Essay Topics Death Penalty Essay. Argumentative Essay on Against the Death Penalty In the United States criminal justice system when a human being takes the life of another human being there are roughly two options for consequences; Life in prison with no possibility of parole or the death penalty. Capital Punishment Essay J. Was this material helpful? Yes No. Leave A Comment? Cancel Reply. About StudySaurus Community. error: Content is protected!! The death penalty is a deterrent that prevents potential criminals from committing serious crimes like murder.
The death penalty is not effective at preventing crime. The justice system does not have the intrinsic moral right to take a life, even that of a murderer. The death penalty is more humane than lifetime imprisonment. The death penalty is cruel and inhumane. Lethal injection is a painless and humane method of execution. Lethal injection is ethically questionable, can cause pain, and is often administered by people who are not trained medical professionals. People deserving of the death penalty can never be rehabilitated or reintroduced to society.
The death penalty is an extremely complex topic that polarizes opinions and touches upon some sensitive moral issues. Capital punishment, which once was a widely spread sentence in the judiciary system, in the 21st century occurs only in 56 of the countries. Most of the countries have abolished this type of punishment, replaced with life imprisonment as the highest possible measure. This is a topic of high importance that involves numerous aspects and is very difficult to come to terms with by its nature. To figure out your personal attitude towards this phenomenon, you might need to do extensive research and check some papers from archives.
If you have such assignment, make sure to check samples of essays on the topic in question, and preferably make an outline, so it will be easier to write an persuasive essay with a clear introduction and argumentative conclusion. Read more. apply filters cancel. Most essays are graded by GradeFixer's experts. Sentence Structure. Evidence and Details. The death penalty is an issue that has the United States quite divided. While there are many supporters of it, there is also a large amount of opposition. Currently, there are thirty-one states in which the death penalty is legal and nineteen states that have Capital Punishment Death Penalty.
Capital punishment, Crime, Death row, Electric chair, Hanging, Lethal injection, Murder, Prison, Torture. The Death Penalty has frequently been on the rise lately. Starting off with one being that the death penalty deters crime, Death Penalty. Capital punishment, Capital punishment in the United States, Crime, Murder, Prison. Death Penalty Philippines. The death penalty is something that many people do not have a clear decision on. Many people support the death penalty, while others wish for the death penalty to be abolished, and there are some that support the death penalty, but only in certain cases Death Penalty Punishment.
Capital punishment, Crime, Death row, Murder, Prison, UN moratorium on the death penalty. Who are you to decide who lives or die? Would you ever want to be put in that situation? I assume your answer is no. Every year there are thousands of people who are innocent and are put on death row, only a few of Capital punishment, Crime, Death row, Decapitation, Hanging, Murder, UN moratorium on the death penalty. Imagine you are accused of murder. You are poor so you know that you had a slim chance of winning without a good lawyer. There is very little evidence to support that you are innocent but still get put to death by lethal injection. Capital punishment, Crime, Death row, Electric chair, Hanging, Lethal injection, Murder, Prison, Stoning.
It should not be given to anybody, whether they are under the age of 18 or not. It is morally wrong and will be the doom of America, The Mighty Capital punishment, Crime, Death row, Murder, Stoning, UN moratorium on the death penalty. The dilemma of whether or not the Death Penalty is ethical is major problem facing society today. The death penalty is given to those who commit crimes deemed by society and government as deserving the infliction of death with crimes such as murder earning this
No comments:
Post a Comment